Why I Don’t Do Extensive Reading (Even Though I Tell My Students To)

In classes, I often find myself falling back on the same piece of advice: read more. It usually comes up when students ask how to improve their vocabulary or push their scores up on tests like TOEIC or TOEFL. I was really pleased to see that some courses at my new job include an extensive reading component (via Xreading), as I am a firm believer in the power of ER. What surprised me, though, was the sheer amount of avoidance and cheating that went on among the students. Yet, as irritating as that was to experience, it did force a bit of honest self-reflection: why don’t I follow my own advice when it comes to my Japanese learning and actually read a bit more? Here’s what I came up with.

Time and Energy

The issue of time is obvious, but is an important one for me. Since starting a new job, most of my attention has been taken up with getting used to new systems, preparing classes, and dealing with professional development. On top of that, I already spend a good deal of time reading for work, mostly academic papers. By the time I get home, the idea of picking up a Japanese book does not feel especially appealing. Whilst students are not in exactly the same situation, their schedules are not empty either. Between classes, assignments, and part-time work, they probably have a bit of a struggle finding time to do their reading.

The Screen Trap

Screen time is another major obstacle, and it affects me just as much as my students. While I manage to avoid the endless doomscrolling of TikTok or Instagram, I am far from immune to digital distractions. In the evenings, it is all too easy to give in to the tempting, dopamine-driven algorithm of YouTube instead of picking up a book. For students who have grown up entirely surrounded by short-form video and interactive media, sitting down with a plain page of text must require an even greater effort of concentration. When your brain is wired for instant hits, traditional reading must seem painfully slow by comparison.

Choice and Content

Finding material that genuinely interests me has been harder than I expected. In English, there is a massive range of graded readers covering everything from crime thrillers to simplified classics. With Japanese, the choices feel noticeably narrower. A lot of the material I come across leans towards folk tales, historical figures, or fairly safe informational topics. While there is nothing wrong with those, they are not things I would choose to read in my own language. There are some exceptions, though. For example, I remember enjoying a simplified version of Oscar Wilde’s The Happy Prince, and I recently bit the bullet and bought a subscription to Satori Reader because the content actually looked interesting. However, it does, of course mean more screen time.

Convenience and Physical Books

Access to graded reading materials is also something of an issue. Physical graded readers in Japanese are not always easy to source, yet I still prefer them over reading on a device. There is a tactile satisfaction in turning physical pages and seeing actual progress that a digital progress bar just cannot match. However, after spending most of my working day staring at a computer screen, switching to an e-reader or phone app for recreation feels uninviting, which leaves me stuck between hard-to-find paper books and eye-draining screens. Digital options like Satori Reader offer a great compromise on content quality, but overcoming that extra evening screen fatigue will no doubt be quite tough.

Cost

Financial investment plays a role here too. Graded readers are relatively expensive, especially given how quickly you read through them. Paying a high price for a thin book that might include outdated extras like companion CDs often feels like a poor return on investment, making it harder to justify building a personal library.

Initial Resistance

Beyond time, cost, or availability, there is the sheer friction of getting started. Even when I have a suitable text right in front of me, taking that first step takes more willpower than it should. It is always easier to push it off until tomorrow. The standard advice is familiar enough: keep sessions short, build a habit, and read a little every day. It is exactly what I tell my students, yet putting it into practice is a definite sticking point.

Where That Leaves Things

Thinking through these points has not changed my belief that reading is valuable, but it has made my own advice feel a bit less straightforward. If an English teacher who understands the theoretical benefits of Extensive Reading still struggles with time, screen distractions, content selection, and friction, it is hardly surprising that language learners struggle too. Closing the gap between recommending reading and actually doing it is where the real work lies. Let’s see how I get on with Satori Reader.

Starting a New Role: Early Reflections

I recently started a new position, and after the first stretch of teaching, I wanted to note a few early thoughts. These are very much initial impressions, and I expect my understanding to develop over time as I settle in.

1. Adjusting to Different Proficiency Levels

One of the most immediate differences has been the overall proficiency level of students. At lower levels in particular, tasks require more careful setup and support. Activities are finished quite quickly, which means lessons need a greater number of shorter activities.

This has all kinds of implications for pacing and teacher energy. Lessons have felt quite intensive, with a need for sustained attention to scaffolding, modelling, and choral drilling. My voice took a bit of a battering during the first week or so and I got a pretty bad sore throat, from which I fortunately recovered fairly quickly.

2. Student Motivation and Classroom Behaviour

Since students are mostly enrolled in compulsory English classes, engagement can vary, and maintaining focus during activities requires consistent monitoring and encouragement. There is also a noticeable emphasis among some students on completing tasks efficiently. This occasionally comes at the expense of actually using English to complete tasks in communicative activities. It is necessary to consistently encourage and support the use of English to ensure students remain on task.

At lower levels, clarity of instruction is especially important. I have found a much greater need for ICQs (Instruction Checking Questions) to make sure the class know what they have to do. Even simple instructions can take time to process, and I have occasionally drawn on (my rather limited) Japanese to support understanding. This has helped maintain lesson flow, although I am aiming to balance this with maximising exposure to English.

3. Homework and Out-of-Class Learning

Students are assigned a substantial amount of homework, including e-learning components and vocabulary study. In practice, completion rates, particularly at lower levels, can be uneven. One approach that has been suggested is to allocate some class time for students to begin homework tasks. Whilst I am sure that this can help ensure engagement, it also raises questions about how best to balance this with time for communicative work during lessons.

4. Materials and Pedagogical Orientation

The course textbooks and materials differ from those I have used previously, and becoming familiar with their structure and sequencing will take some time to adjust to. There is a strong focus on bottom-up listening skills, including suprasegmental features, which play an important role in supporting beginner learners. At the same time, my early experience has highlighted the value of incorporating tasks that create a clearer need to communicate. I am interested in exploring how task-based elements can complement the existing materials and support more meaningful language use in class. This is something I hope to develop further and will return to in a future post.For now, I am working within the materials, experimenting with different activities, and identifying what works best.

5. Institutional Systems and Processes

As expected, institutional systems differ from place to place. While I have prior experience with Moodle, the platform is used more extensively here, with a wider range of functions available to instructors. Becoming familiar with these features has taken some time. Some textbooks have their own LMS for students and (I am pleased to report) that there is an extensive reading element via the online platform XReading. There are also additional internal systems for tasks such as attendance tracking. I am still in the process of learning how all these systems operate, although I expect this will become more straightforward with regular use.

6. Research Directions

This transition has also prompted some reflection on my research interests. Much of my previous work has focused on supporting independent learning outside the classroom including goal-setting approaches such as SMART goals. In the current context, where motivation and proficiency levels vary, I may need to adapt this focus. At the same time, there appear to be clear opportunities to continue developing work in areas such as extensive reading and listening, potentially in ways that fit more closely with students’ immediate needs.

7. Settling In

As with any new role, there is an initial period of adjustment. The range of new variables, from student needs to institutional systems, can feel demanding at first. That said, things are already becoming more familiar, and I am finding a rhythm. For now, the priority is to take the time to understand the context fully, experiment thoughtfully, and avoid rushing to conclusions. There is plenty to learn, and that process is very much underway.

I am very grateful for the Golden Week break in Japan which has given me a few days to unwind!

Six Years of Podcasting: What I Learned From Creating a Student‑Focused Show

When I made my first recording with a student about her study abroad experiences, I had no idea that it would grow into a six-year project involving more than 170 episodes. What started as a small experiment eventually developed into one of the most rewarding parts of my teaching life.

What the Podcast Is

The podcast is aimed at the university-aged students in my department. It includes a mixture of short monologues, conversations between two people, interviews with students and staff, and occasional videocasts recorded by students. Topics cover culture, language tips, study abroad, and university life. We now have twelve seasons, with around 180 publised episodes available on Spotify.

Why I Started

When I launched the podcast in 2019, I felt our curriculum was heavily focused on reading and writing, but offered limited listening practice. Although we had intensive listening tasks in class, I wanted something that students could listen to extensively and informally outside class.

The timing also played a role. The podcast began at the start of the coronavirus pandemic, which removed many opportunities for casual interaction. It offered students a way to hear teachers and classmates speak naturally at a time when we couldn’t have classes together. Students returning from study abroad had stories worth sharing, and this gave them a voice.

There was also a professional development aspect for me. Learning how to create and distribute a podcast felt valuable and directly relevant to teaching in the digital age.

What I Learned

Starting a podcast is far simpler than many people imagine. I used Anchor (now Spotify for Creators), and it handled hosting and distribution for free. For a small, niche podcast like ours, it worked perfectly.

The equipment does not need to be sophisticated. Although I bought a condenser microphone, pop-shield and audio interface, I ended up recording most episodes using the microphone on my iPad or iPhone. Editing was typically limited to trimming the beginning and end of the audio in GarageBand.

Production gets faster with experience. Once I had a system, I could record a five‑minute episode in under twenty minutes. I wrote rough scripts early on, but AI has made drafting much quicker in recent years.

Topic choice matters. Popular themes included pop culture, British culture, language tests, brand histories, and language tips. The most listened‑to episodes by far were interviews with students about their study abroad experiences. Over time, these have been integrated into our study abroad preparation courses, helping students learn from real voices and real situations..

Student involvement is powerful, even if difficult to coordinate. Students rarely volunteered, but almost all who participated felt proud afterwards. I would have liked more student‑generated content, although managing this takes more time.

The Future

Recently I experimented with videocasts since Spotify now supports video. I expected this to be more appealing since many students are heavy YouTube users. Surprisingly to me, the listener numbers did not change. It may be that Spotify may not be the best place for video. Perhaps if the videocasts were uploaded to YouTube, they might attract more engagement. In addition, video production takes significantly longer than producing audio‑only episodes. Even short clips require much more editing time, and this extra workload is difficult to justify for a small, niche project.

Looking ahead, I am aware that AI-generated podcasts are becoming more common. High‑quality automated content will likely fill podcast platforms in the near future. Even so, I believe there will always be a place for authentic student voices. Real experiences and real conversations have a value that AI cannot replace. Whatever direction the project takes, it has been a meaningful part of my work, and I hope it continues to provide students with something useful.

Link the podcast is here:

https://open.spotify.com/show/04UyCI0pyvJi6LBVr1QBRo