Six Years of Podcasting: What I Learned From Creating a Student‑Focused Show

When I made my first recording with a student about her study abroad experiences, I had no idea that it would grow into a six-year project involving more than 170 episodes. What started as a small experiment eventually developed into one of the most rewarding parts of my teaching life.

What the Podcast Is

The podcast is aimed at the university-aged students in my department. It includes a mixture of short monologues, conversations between two people, interviews with students and staff, and occasional videocasts recorded by students. Topics cover culture, language tips, study abroad, and university life. We now have twelve seasons, with around 180 publised episodes available on Spotify.

Why I Started

When I launched the podcast in 2019, I felt our curriculum was heavily focused on reading and writing, but offered limited listening practice. Although we had intensive listening tasks in class, I wanted something that students could listen to extensively and informally outside class.

The timing also played a role. The podcast began at the start of the coronavirus pandemic, which removed many opportunities for casual interaction. It offered students a way to hear teachers and classmates speak naturally at a time when we couldn’t have classes together. Students returning from study abroad had stories worth sharing, and this gave them a voice.

There was also a professional development aspect for me. Learning how to create and distribute a podcast felt valuable and directly relevant to teaching in the digital age.

What I Learned

Starting a podcast is far simpler than many people imagine. I used Anchor (now Spotify for Creators), and it handled hosting and distribution for free. For a small, niche podcast like ours, it worked perfectly.

The equipment does not need to be sophisticated. Although I bought a condenser microphone, pop-shield and audio interface, I ended up recording most episodes using the microphone on my iPad or iPhone. Editing was typically limited to trimming the beginning and end of the audio in GarageBand.

Production gets faster with experience. Once I had a system, I could record a five‑minute episode in under twenty minutes. I wrote rough scripts early on, but AI has made drafting much quicker in recent years.

Topic choice matters. Popular themes included pop culture, British culture, language tests, brand histories, and language tips. The most listened‑to episodes by far were interviews with students about their study abroad experiences. Over time, these have been integrated into our study abroad preparation courses, helping students learn from real voices and real situations..

Student involvement is powerful, even if difficult to coordinate. Students rarely volunteered, but almost all who participated felt proud afterwards. I would have liked more student‑generated content, although managing this takes more time.

The Future

Recently I experimented with videocasts since Spotify now supports video. I expected this to be more appealing since many students are heavy YouTube users. Surprisingly to me, the listener numbers did not change. It may be that Spotify may not be the best place for video. Perhaps if the videocasts were uploaded to YouTube, they might attract more engagement. In addition, video production takes significantly longer than producing audio‑only episodes. Even short clips require much more editing time, and this extra workload is difficult to justify for a small, niche project.

Looking ahead, I am aware that AI-generated podcasts are becoming more common. High‑quality automated content will likely fill podcast platforms in the near future. Even so, I believe there will always be a place for authentic student voices. Real experiences and real conversations have a value that AI cannot replace. Whatever direction the project takes, it has been a meaningful part of my work, and I hope it continues to provide students with something useful.

Link the podcast is here:

https://open.spotify.com/show/04UyCI0pyvJi6LBVr1QBRo


Why Write Conference Reflections?

Starting this blog has made me think more carefully about my professional writing. As part of setting up this WordPress site, I gathered a list of my publications to show what I’ve worked on so far. It seemed useful to have everything in one place and easy to update.

As I went through the list, I noticed something interesting: quite a few of my publications were conference reviews or reflections. I think there are five so far, and there may well be more to come.

That got me thinking. Is that too many? Is it worth writing up your thoughts on conferences? After some reflection, I believe there are several good reasons to do so:

1) Publications

“Publish or die” is a familiar saying in academia. Writing a conference review can be a relatively straightforward way for early-career or novice writers (a group I still consider myself part of) to gain experience with academic publishing and build up a CV.

Some outlets, such as the JALT Teacher Development SIG’s Explorations in Teacher Development, go through a peer-review process. If you choose your target publication carefully, your reflection can even count as a peer-reviewed piece, adding genuine value to your academic record.

2) Money

For teachers without access to institutional research budgets, writing a conference review can also open doors to small grants or travel support. Some JALT SIGs, such as CUE (College and University Educators), offer financial assistance in exchange for a review. Similarly, some conferences, like PANSIG, have funding available for participants who are willing to write about their experiences.

3) Reflection

Many people attend conferences to give a presentation, meet colleagues, or fulfil professional obligations. Writing a review encourages a different kind of engagement. It pushes you to think carefully about what you’ve seen, reflect on key ideas, and consider how they might connect to your own teaching or research. That process of reflection can sometimes lead to unexpected insights that benefit both you and your learners.

Writing a review also takes real effort. Staying focused throughout a full day, or even several days, of presentations is not easy. It demands concentration, strong note-taking skills, and good organisation to make sense of multiple topics and speakers. It can be hard work, but the discipline it requires often makes the experience more rewarding.

4) Connection (Networking)

Writing a review can be a good way to strengthen professional connections. You might contact someone whose presentation you mentioned, share your write-up with them, or tag them in a LinkedIn post. It’s a genuine and positive way to build relationships, and most presenters appreciate hearing how their ideas were received.

5) Promoting Local / Smaller Conferences

Across Japan, there are conferences happening almost every week, and smaller or more specialised events can sometimes be overlooked. Organising a conference takes a huge amount of time and commitment. While most people know the larger gatherings, such as JALT National or PANSIG, smaller events also deserve recognition.

One of my recent pieces was about the FSIJ (Film Studies In Japan) conference, and the organiser was genuinely pleased that I had taken the time to write about it. It was clear that the event had taken a great deal of effort to organise, and I was happy to help highlight that work.

Other reasons?

You could also add that writing conference reflections helps consolidate learning, contribute to the professional community, and build your online presence. But I think my list of five is enough for now.

Final thoughts

Conference reflections may not be the most glamorous form of academic writing, but they combine many valuable skills: critical thinking, synthesis, communication, and reflection. They also give back to the professional community by sharing ideas and highlighting others’ work.

I plan to continue reflecting on my conference experiences here on the blog, though perhaps it’s time to encourage others to share their own perspectives as well. After all, the more voices we have reflecting on professional learning, the richer our community becomes.